Events & Action Items

Catherine Cole on Prospects for California's University, February 17, at the IHC

Stanley Fish and Cary Nelson at UCSB, February 3, 2011

Faculty Forum,
January 13, 2011, at the IHC -- Letter from UC President Mark Yudof on the proposed State Budget , January 2011

Archived Event,
Spring 2010-Fall 2010


Quick Links

-- News and Posting Alert --

-- UC Pension Crisis --

-- UC Commission of the Future
--

FORUM: "Trading Futures: Prospects for California's University"
Catherine Cole (Theater, Dance and Performance Studies, UC Berkeley)
Thursday, February 17 / 4:00 PM
. Interdisciplinary Humanities Center. McCune Conference Room, 6020 HSSB.
“If universities can’t find the will to innovate and adapt to changes in the world around them,” says educational innovator David Wiley in Amy Kamenetz’s recent book DIY U, “universities will be irrelevant by 2020.” We might ask: relevant to whom and for what purpose? Yet there is no denying that universities are not prepared for the magnitude of the challenges ahead: In order to achieve President Obama’s goal that by 2020 “America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world,” California alone will have to produce one million more college degrees between 2010 and 2020. However our current planning, such as the UC’s Commission on the Future, falls far short of addressing such demands. And with a rapidly shrinking middle class and skyrocketing tuition, many college graduates will find that unlike in the 1960s when a college education was a passport to the middle class, today’s degree gains them admission to an endless cycle of debt and poverty.
We are witnessing a paradigm shift in the academy, a change of epochal proportions. If universities are to be relevant in the future, we need visionary long range planning, extraordinary innovation, and openness to radical change (which can be a challenge for those who’ve grown comfortable in the academic guild). The UC has some of the best, brightest, and most innovative faculty in the world. What would it mean for its faculty--rather than for-profit college owners, trade book authors, and UC administrators who have done little or no undergraduate teaching--to be at the center of devising a new future for higher education? What might that future look like?
Sponsored by the IHC's Faculty Forums on the Future of the University series and the UCSB Faculty Association.
____________________________________________________________________

ARTHUR N. RUPE GREAT DEBATE: Academic Freedom in a Time of Crisis
Stanley Fish & Cary Nelson
Thursday, February 3 / 8:00 PM


Outspoken public intellectuals and academic leaders Stanley Fish and Cary Nelson will go head to head for a lively discussion on the role of academic freedom in higher learning. Fish, a Professor of Humanities and Law at Florida International University, is the author of the book Save the World on Your Own Time, which argues that academic freedom is the freedom to present material and the methods for analysis, never to proselytize or advance political agendas. Nelson, a professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois and current President of the American Association of University Professors, is the author of the book No University is an Island, a comprehensive account of the social, political and cultural forces that undermine academic freedom
Presented by the College of Letters & Science at UC Santa Barbara and made possible by an endowment from the Arthur N. Rupe Foundation.
Co-presented by the Interdisciplinary Humanities Center?s Faculty Forums on the Future of the University series and UCSB Arts & Lectures.
On the subject of academic freedom, please see their recent books:
* Stanley Fish: Save the World on Your Own Time
* Cary Nelson: No University is an Island
_____________________________________________________________________

FACULTY FORUM: Is Online Education the Answer?
Thursday, January 13 / 4:00 PM
McCune Conference Room, 6020 HSSB

Is online instruction the future of undergraduate teaching?  Is online education truly cost-effective?  Can it improve undergraduate education? Is it the form that undergraduate instruction is destined to take? Is the University of California prepared to move to online instruction, and are its faculty prepared to embrace it?  Join us for a roundtable discussion of online instruction and UCOP’s Online Instruction Pilot Project.  Participants will include Alan Liu, Chair, Department of English; Karen Lunsford, Writing Program; George Michaels, Executive Director, Instructional Development.

Sponsored by the IHC's Faculty Forums series and the UCSB Faculty Association.
__________________________________________________________________________

News Alert:

  • CUCFA votes in favor of a full legislative hearing on the confirmation of David Crane as UC Regent unless Governor Brown withdraws the appointment (March 4, 2011). See Senator Yee's answer to Regent-Designate Crane's op-ed piece (San Francisco Gate, 2/27/2011) and Crane's answer.

  • Real News Network's interview with Cary Nelson (President, AAUP) about the Ohio bill to kill faculty unions (March 4, 2011).

  • Chris Newfield's new blog on the Huffington Post: Phony Budgets are Suffocating Public Universities (March 4, 2011).

  • Read Stanton A. Glantz's article in the Sacramento Bee: "Viewpoints: Brown spurs an adult discussion on the value of public education." (Febr. 17, 2011).

  • Bob Samuels's posting on "Understanding the History and Structure of the UC Budget" (Febr. 15, 2011).

  • Bob Samuels's posting on Governor Brown's call to cut UC Budget by $500 Million.

  • Stanton Glantz's working paper: How Much Will it Cost Us to Restore Public Education? ( from summer 2010).

______________
UC Pension Crisis:

_______________
UC Commission of the Future:

Back to top

For information on all events and enclosed content, please send a message to: info[at]ucsbfa.org

From the Office of UC President Mark Yudof, regarding the proposed State Budget, and the financial impact on the University of California.

January 10, 2011

Colleagues:

I wanted to reach out to each of you personally today to share the news that the Governor's proposed budget for the 2011-12 fiscal year includes deep cuts to the University of California. While this news is not a surprise given the state's financial crisis, I recognize that it means
additional sacrifice for all members of the UC community, who have already sacrificed much.

You are the heart and soul of this University, and it will take all of us, working together, to find a way to meet these cuts while still maintaining the core academic and research mission. I will share with you more specific budget information as we get it and to seek your participation as we work
through this difficult situation centrally and on the campuses. Clearly, it's time for us to engage Californians in a discussion of exactly what UC means to the future of this state, and thus I am forwarding you the below response to the Governor's budget I have issued.

Sincerely yours, Mark G. Yudof

******************************************************

Monday, January 10, 2011
University of California Office of the President

In response to Gov. Brown's proposed budget, released today, University of California President Mark Yudof issued the following open letter to California:

This is a sad day for California. In the budget proposed by Gov. Brown, the collective tuition payments made by University of California students for the first time in history would exceed what the state contributes to the system's general fund. The crossing of this threshold transcends mere
symbolism and should be profoundly disturbing to all Californians.

Early and enduring support for the University of California has been critical to the state's success, seeding the world's eighth largest economy, shaping its society and serving its citizenry in myriad other ways. California emerged as the Great Exception, to borrow Carey McWilliams' phrase, in large part because of this investment, made across generations by all California taxpayers in the service of a common good.

Undeniably, the governor's hand has been forced. He has produced, as he calls it, a tough budget for tough times, and the university will stand up and do all it can to help the state through what is a fiscal, structural and political crisis. There can be no business as usual.

To that end, I will be giving each of the system's 10 chancellors specific budget reduction targets and asking them to develop and report back to me within six weeks their plans for meeting them. We will do the same at the system's central office. I then will go to our governing Board of Regents
with a detailed scenario of what steps would be required to absorb a $500 million reduction -- a reduction that will take the state's annual per student contribution to $7,210, compared to the $7,930 to be paid by students and their families.

Precision is difficult with a reduction of this magnitude, but every effort will be made to protect the quality that has made the University of California -- and the state it serves -- the envy of the world. My intent is to preserve the core academic and research mission as much as possible. My preference at this point, and my sense of where the Board of Regents stands on this issue, is to not seek an additional fee increase; that said, I cannot fully commit to this course until the Board and I have assessed the impact of permanent reductions on campuses. I also will attempt to maintain, if feasible, the programs of financial aid that are so crucial to our public mission of serving all qualified California students, regardless of family income level.

But let me be blunt: This won't be easy, and all possible remedies must be considered. The cuts the governor proposes will require sacrifice, pain and courage. Already we are working hard to streamline administrative functions, looking to create $500 million in savings within the next few
years. While we are striving to realize the savings as quickly as possible, it still won't be enough. With the governor's budget, as proposed, we will be digging deep into bone. The physics of the situation cannot be denied -- as the core budget shrinks, so must the university.

All of this comes at a time when more California students than ever are applying to attend a University of California campus. My hope is that going forward, Californians will begin to ponder the implications of declining state support for their university. The proposed budget will reduce
taxpayer investment by an additional 16.4 percent; in just 20 years state support, as measured on a per-student basis and adjusted for inflation, will have declined by 57 percent. Rising tuition and fees have made up only half of this shortfall. The cost of producing a credit hour actually has
decreased; it's the students' co-pay, if you will, that has risen.

The governor in his inaugural address invoked the irrepressible California spirit. He quoted from the crossing journals of his great-grandfather, who endured many hardships as he trekked to California in 1852. It is interesting to note that, even as the governor's ancestor embarked on this journey, newly arrived Californians already were making the case for an educated populace that would ensure prosperity long after the gold mines were played out.

"We hope for a better time; for a time when our people will call California by those good old words 'Our Commonwealth'," proclaimed The Pacific newspaper, in an Oct. 10, 1851 editorial. "... When we have reached this condition, teachers will be welcomed, schoolhouses, academies and colleges
will be built and filled, and the means of a varied and large education provided."

It continued: "Whatever difficulty and discouragement may now surround the effort to make California as rich in mind as she is in gold, they are to diminish. The institutions profitable for wisdom, as well as all other institutions which mark the progress, character, honor and virtue of a
State, are to be here. It is only a question of time...."

Now, 160 years later, California must take up the question of whether it wishes to turn back from the wisdom and foresight of these earliest Californians. With the advantage of hindsight, it should be abundantly clear: The stakes are as high today as they were back then.

Updated, March 4, 2011